header-logo header-logo

31 January 2025 / Imogen Dodds , Jamie Sutherland
Issue: 8102 / Categories: Features , Construction , Property , Limitation , International
printer mail-detail

A constructive construction project?

205948
Imogen Dodds & Jamie Sutherland consider a Hong Kong case that gives clarity on limitation periods in constructive trust claims
  • In Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo [2024] HKCFA 32, Lord Hoffmann confirmed in the Hong Kong Court of Final Appeal that claims against category 2 constructive trustees (ie, people whose trusteeship arises from a wrongful act) do not fall within the equivalent provision of s 21(1)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980.
  • Accordingly, claims by a beneficiary to recover trust property from a category 2 constructive trustee are not excluded from the application of limitation periods.
  • Instead, such claims are subject to the usual six-year limitation period.

The Court of Final Appeal of Hong Kong published its decision in Hui Chun Ping v Hui Kau Mo [2024] HKCFA 32 on 23 December 2024, with the lead judgment given by Lord Hoffmann. It is of interest to those practising in England and Wales, as the statutory provision considered by the court is in materially identical terms to s 21(1)(b) of the UK Limitation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll