header-logo header-logo

31 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Legal News , Public
printer mail-detail

£70K shrub squabble

Six square metres of shrubs has cost two neighbours £70,000 in dispute that will continue in the Court of Appeal this autumn.

Cheltenham neighbours Martin Charalambous and Dr Welding will now resume their fight over a worthless patch of pyrocanthus shrubs after Mr Justice Jacob granted Charalambous permission to appeal, but urged the neighbours to consider mediation.

Last December, Gloucester County Court ruled in favour of Welding’s claim that the Land Registry records showed the boundary between their properties, and ordered Charalambous to pay £70,000 costs. Charalambous, on the other hand, maintains that the line of bushes marks the boundary. Charalambous’s solicitor, Conrad Gadd of Gadd and Co, says: “Everyone ought to sit down and negotiate. Our point of view is we’d like to. But it’s not very likely.”

Tim Wallis, mediator, North West Mediation Solutions, says a dispute of this sort would typically cost about £5,000–£6,000, once solicitors’ fees for both sides were taken into account, if they opted for mediation.

“People want their day in court, but that doesn’t actually give you a chance to get it off your chest because the verbal evidence

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll