header-logo header-logo

11 July 2025 / Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court , Freezing orders
printer mail-detail

Freezing injunctions at 50 (Pt 2)

225402
After half a century, the freezing injunction is growing bolder & bolder, writes Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
  • Since 1975, freezing injunctions have expanded in scope and complexity. Recent case law has debated what assets are caught and whether the ‘good arguable case’ test aligns with the ‘serious issue to be tried’ standard.
  • Practical challenges persist, including the high cost of applications and the burden of rapid disclosure on defendants.

As Mary Young wrote recently in this journal, Mareva injunctions (freezing orders) were born on 23 June 1975, when the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mareva Cia Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA The Mareva [1980] 1 All ER 213 (see ‘50 years & counting’, NLJ, 13 June 2025, p9).

Fifty years later, senior judges and lawyers met on 23 June 2025 for a seminar to mark the 50th anniversary. Lord Denning MR opened his judgment in The Mareva by saying that the case raised a ‘very important point of practice’, but surely no one in court on 23 June 1975 foresaw

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll