header-logo header-logo

Freezing injunctions at 50 (Pt 2)

11 July 2025 / Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
Issue: 8124 / Categories: Features , Profession , In Court , Freezing orders
printer mail-detail
225402
After half a century, the freezing injunction is growing bolder & bolder, writes Rebecca Sabben-Clare KC
  • Since 1975, freezing injunctions have expanded in scope and complexity. Recent case law has debated what assets are caught and whether the ‘good arguable case’ test aligns with the ‘serious issue to be tried’ standard.
  • Practical challenges persist, including the high cost of applications and the burden of rapid disclosure on defendants.

As Mary Young wrote recently in this journal, Mareva injunctions (freezing orders) were born on 23 June 1975, when the Court of Appeal handed down judgment in Mareva Cia Naviera SA v International Bulkcarriers SA The Mareva [1980] 1 All ER 213 (see ‘50 years & counting’, NLJ, 13 June 2025, p9).

Fifty years later, senior judges and lawyers met on 23 June 2025 for a seminar to mark the 50th anniversary. Lord Denning MR opened his judgment in The Mareva by saying that the case raised a ‘very important point of practice’, but surely no one in court on 23 June 1975 foresaw

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

Excello Law—Heather Horsewood & Darren Barwick

North west team expands with senior private client and property hires

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Ward Hadaway—Paul Wigham

Firm boosts corporate team in Newcastle to support high-growth technology businesses

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll