header-logo header-logo

04 October 2018
Issue: 7811 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

£4m shortfall could spark direct action protests

The Criminal Bar Association (CBA) is consulting heads of chambers about potentially resuming direct action protests unless the government fulfils its promise of extra funds.

In May, the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) offered criminal barristers an extra £15m for publicly funded defence work in the Crown Court in return for the Bar suspending its boycott of reforms to the Advocates’ Graduated Fee Scheme.

The deal was struck to prevent criminal barristers from engaging in an additional ‘no returns’ protest, under which barristers would refuse to cover for each other on cases where there was a timetable clash.

A 51.5% majority of more than 3,000 criminal barristers voted to accept the MoJ offer. However, CBA chair Chris Henley QC says the current form of the scheme, when applied to 2017–18 figures, would fall £4m short of the promise. He has also complained about delays to the four-week MoJ consultation on the spending increase. It was originally pitched to begin in mid-July, did not start until 31 August and has now been extended by a further fortnight to 12 October.

In his message to members this week, Henley said: ‘£15m must mean £15m. Every week that passes saves the MoJ money. The 1% [increase in fees] scheduled for April must be brought forward to compensate.

‘The delay is causing increasing anger, as are some of the fees now being billed under the new scheme.’

Henley said a barrister was recently paid a fee of only £900 for a guilty plea in a multihanded rape and grooming case with 15,000 pages of evidence. ‘Fees at this level for many, many hours of work, and the heavy professional responsibility, will decimate career progression and threaten the viability of chambers,’ he added.

Issue: 7811 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll