header-logo header-logo

14 August 2008
Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Damages
printer mail-detail

£4.3m landmark compensation for injured Man United star

Insurance premiums set to rise after club and player admit liability

A decision to award a former trainee footballer, whose career was ended by a negligent tackle, £4.3m will have wide ranging ramifications for all levels of the game, experts say.

Manchester United trainee Ben Collett suffered a double fracture of the lower leg following a tackle by Middlesbrough’s Gary Smith in a reserve match in May 2003. In court both Middlesbrough and Smith admitted that the tackle was “negligent” leaving Mrs Justice Swift to assess the level of compensation that Collett should receive from Middlesbrough’s insurers.

Richard Hartley QC of Cobden House Chambers in Manchester says the ramifications of the judgment will be felt across all levels of football: “Clubs at both amateur and professional standing will need to examine carefully their third party insurance liability cover as cases like this will inevitably become more commonplace.”

Hartley continues: “Individual professionals, even many Premier League stars, have cover which is inadequate, particularly in light of the judgment. In practical terms we deal with an awful lot of these cases where amateur players lose their earnings because of events that happen on a Sunday morning, but why should they put up with it?”

Greg Rollingson, senior partner at Rollingsons Solicitors, says that proving liability is key to any similar claim.

“To succeed in an action for damages, an injured professional footballer would need to show that, on the balance of probabilities, that his opponent would have known that there was a significant risk that if he tackled in the way he did, the other player would be seriously injured,” he says.

Rollingson continues, “Essentially he would have to show that his opponent had been guilty of dangerous and reckless play to establish liability. Football clubs may now find that their insurance premiums increase in light of this judgment”.

Issue: 7334 / Categories: Legal News , Damages
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll