header-logo header-logo

24-hour retirement

16 October 2008 / Roderick Ramage
Issue: 7341 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

The NHS pension scheme makes a mountain out of flexible retirement, says Roderick Ramage

The principle of the 24-hour retirement rule is that a member of the NHS pension scheme may receive retirement benefits from the scheme and return to work if two conditions are satisfied:

retirement from NHS work for not less than 24 hours; and

that the retired member does not work for more than 16 hours per week in the first month after the pension becomes payable.

The application of this rule is described in a letter from the NHS Pensions Agency to all NHS chief executives, payroll managers et al, written in August 2006 to clarify “the rules regarding qualifying for retirement”. The letter deals with officer scheme members, practitioner scheme members and ill health pension benefits. Although not stated expressly it is probable that it came into effect on 6 April 2006. This date, known as A-Day is the day on which Pt 4 of the Finance Act 2004 (FA 2004) came into force and wholly reformed the basis on which pension are taxed. The government called it “simplification” but pension

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

NEWS

NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
back-to-top-scroll