header-logo header-logo

21 May 2010 / Alex H Rene , Lista M Cannon
Issue: 7418 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

21st century challenge

Lista M Cannon & Alex H Rene assess compliance confrontations in the wake of the new Bribery Act

The Bribery Act 2010 received Royal Assent on 8 April 2010, over a century after the passing of the laws that established the UK’s framework for the prosecution of bribery and corruption offences. While the Act is expected to come into force later in 2010 (possibly October) businesses must now pay close attention to the offences created by the Act, including the new corporate offence of failing to prevent bribery, and the severe penalties that businesses and individuals may face for failure to comply with the Act.

Bribery of another person

It is an offence under the Act if one “offers, promises or gives a financial or other advantage to another person” intending that person to perform improperly a relevant function or activity. The scope for what might amount to a “financial or other advantage” is broad. A breach occurs where the bribing party knows or believes that the acceptance of the advantage in itself constitutes the improper performance of a relevant

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll