header-logo header-logo

12 November 2010 / Jonathan Herring
Issue: 7441 / Categories: Features , Family
printer mail-detail

20:10:2010

Jonathan Herring on the death knell of marriage

he twentieth of October 2010. Mark that date in your diary. It was beginning of the end for marriage. On that day the Supreme Court in Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 made a decisive step toward reducing marriage to a contract: marriage diminished to a private autonomous agreement between individuals.

I say a step towards reducing marriage to a contract because, of course, their lordships were not saying that pre-marriage agreements are now binding contracts. They made it clear that a court could make an ancillary relief order under the Matrimonial Causes Act 1973 that departed from a “pre-nup” where it would not be fair to hold the parties to the agreement. They gave examples when a pre-nup would not be fair: where it fails to provide for the needs of the children or for the needs of a spouse (paras 76, 77).

However, that should not disguise the fact the decision marks the contractualisation of marriage. In the future, in ancillary relief cases involving a pre-nup the starting point will be that the pre-nup will be

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll