header-logo header-logo

profile-sm_7

Jonathan Fowles

Barrister

Jonathan Fowles, barrister, Serle Court Chambers (www.serlecourt.co.uk)

    Barrister

    Jonathan Fowles, barrister, Serle Court Chambers (www.serlecourt.co.uk)

      ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

      The Pallant v Morgan equity is a generator of uncertainty, says Jonathan Fowles

      Jonathan Fowles reviews the latest attempt to wrestle with strict liability for fire damage

      It is impossible to draw a line under boundary disputes, discovers Jonathan Fowles

      Show
      8
      Results
      Results
      8
      Results

      MOVERS & SHAKERS

      Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

      Hogan Lovells—Lisa Quelch

      Partner hire strengthens global infrastructure and energy financing practice

      Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

      Sherrards—Jan Kunstyr

      Legal director bolsters international expertise in dispute resolution team

      Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

      Muckle LLP—Stacey Brown

      Corporate governance and company law specialist joins the team

      NEWS

      NOTICE UNDER THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925

      HERBERT SMITH STAFF PENSION SCHEME (THE “SCHEME”)

      NOTICE TO CREDITORS AND BENEFICIARIES UNDER SECTION 27 OF THE TRUSTEE ACT 1925
      Law firm HFW is offering clients lawyers on call for dawn raids, sanctions issues and other regulatory emergencies
      From gender-critical speech to notice periods and incapability dismissals, employment law continues to turn on fine distinctions. In his latest employment law brief for NLJ, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School reviews a cluster of recent decisions, led by Bailey v Stonewall, where the Court of Appeal clarified the limits of third-party liability under the Equality Act
      Non-molestation orders are meant to be the frontline defence against domestic abuse, yet their enforcement often falls short. Writing in NLJ this week, Jeni Kavanagh, Jessica Mortimer and Oliver Kavanagh analyse why the criminalisation of breach has failed to deliver consistent protection
      Assisted dying remains one of the most fraught fault lines in English law, where compassion and criminal liability sit uncomfortably close. Writing in NLJ this week, Julie Gowland and Barny Croft of Birketts examine how acts motivated by care—booking travel, completing paperwork, or offering emotional support—can still fall within the wide reach of the Suicide Act 1961
      back-to-top-scroll