Dr Ping-fat Sze

Dr Ping-fat Sze JP (Aus) barrister, chartered arbitrator & criminal law specialist. Newlawjournal.co.uk

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR

Go to page of 2

The Tai Po fire exposed Hong Kong’s longstanding failures in law enforcement, building management & judicial oversight, writes Dr Ping-fat Sze

Dr Ping-fat Sze is perplexed by the treatment of irrational prosecutorial decisions

Dr Ping-fat Sze examines the reviewability of prosecutorial decisions, & the effect on access to justice

Dr Ping-fat Sze examines the reviewability of prosecutorial decisions & asks: are mistakes being made?

It’s time to refocus attention on the administration of criminal justice in this former British colony. Dr Ping-fat Sze explains why

The denial of Jimmy Lai’s right to be defended by a lawyer of his choice casts serious doubt on Hong Kong’s legal future, says Dr Ping-fat Sze

Ping-fat Sze questions whether parties involved in small claims proceedings are fairly treated

Lay litigants left behind: are small claims proceedings in Hong Kong fit for purpose? Dr Ping-fat Sze investigates

Show

Results

Go to page of 2

MOVERS & SHAKERS

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS

Pro Bono Week marks silver jubilee

The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK

NLJ this week: Pro bono’s silver lining

Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice

NLJ this week: Wrong expert, costly exit

Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case

Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues

NLJ this week: Discounted damages, different costs

A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims