header-logo header-logo

45612

Celso De Azevedo

Barrister

Celso De Azevedo (FCIArb and FedArb) is an international re/insurance and commercial dispute resolution barrister at 36 Commercial, The 36 Group  (36group.co.uk/members/cda).

Barrister

Celso De Azevedo (FCIArb and FedArb) is an international re/insurance and commercial dispute resolution barrister at 36 Commercial, The 36 Group  (36group.co.uk/members/cda).

ARTICLES BY THIS AUTHOR
Celso De Azevedo examines cyber-attacks, theft of confidential information & Norwich Pharmacal orders
With digital currencies continuing to strengthen their foothold in the financial landscape, calls are increasing for a global response to regulate their use. Celso De Azevedo & Marc Samuels of 36 Commercial explore the most recent regulatory developments on both sides of the Atlantic
What now for COVID-19 business interruption claims? Celso De Azevedo discusses the Supreme Court’s judgment & the issues likely to drive future litigation
Celso De Azevedo, 36 Commercial, reports on the latest trends in cyber insurance post-COVID-19
Show
8
Results
Results
8
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

Anthony Collins—20 promotions

20 promotions mark major people investment at national law firm, Anthony Collins

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley—Elaine Whiteford

Sidley adds competition litigator Elaine Whiteford in London

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys—Claudina D’Costa

Charles Russell Speechlys welcomes Claudina D’Costa as Director of Client Development Marketing

NEWS
The 25th Pro Bono Week begins today until 6 November, with events hosted by law firms, chambers, law schools and charities across the UK
Pro bono is celebrating a silver anniversary, with initiatives putting businesses and students at the heart of access to justice
Choosing the wrong expert can cost a clinical negligence claimant more than their case
Judges risk weakening their own independence by staying silent over government reforms, a leading public lawyer argues
A discount on damages does not automatically mean an equivalent haircut for legal costs in military deafness claims
back-to-top-scroll