header-logo header-logo

10 January 2018
Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-detail

Legal aid evidence victory

Five-year time limit abandoned for domestic violence victims

A major evidential obstacle to legal aid for domestic abuse victims has been dropped by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) following a campaign by lawyers and support organisations.

As of this week, there will be no time limit on abuse evidence in private family law disputes-previously, victims had to prove they had suffered, or been at risk of suffering, domestic abuse or child abuse in the previous five years. Opponents said the restrictions prevented about 50% of domestic abuse victims receiving legal aid.

The range of documents accepted as evidence of abuse has also been widened, and will now include statements from domestic violence support organisations and housing support officers.

The Court of Appeal held the evidence requirements set out in LASPO (Legal Aid, Sentencing and Punishment of Offenders Act (LASPO) 2012), unlawful in February 2016, in R (on the application of) Rights of Women v Lord Chancellor [2016] EWCA Civ 91. The MoJ made the reforms after consulting with charities and legal bodies, including the charity Rights of Women, which brought the legal challenge.

Carol Storer, director of Legal Aid Practitioners Group, said less than half of victims fleeing domestic abuse have been able to access legal aid due to the evidence requirements.

‘The evidence was time limited, failing to recognise that the impact and risk associated with abuse can be lifelong,’ she said.

‘The ability to obtain the necessary evidence is difficult and random and often has a cost involved. Obtaining it is usually inconsistent with the lifestyle of the vast majority of victims fleeing domestic abuse.’ Moreover, obtaining evidence of emotional, psychological, financial abuse or coercive control rather than physical abuse was often difficult.

‘It has taken a long time to bring about these changes, and there are still many hurdles in place.’

Law Society vice president Christina Blacklaws said the reform ‘will make it easier for victims to qualify for legal aid and access essential help and support’.

Former justice minister Dominic Raab said: ‘We have listened to victims’ groups and carefully reviewed the criteria for legal aid for victims of domestic abuse in family cases.’

 

Issue: 7776 / Categories: Legal News , Legal aid focus
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

Freeths—Michelle Kirkland Elias

International hospitality and leisure specialist joins corporate team as partner

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Flint Bishop—Deborah Niven

Firm appoints head of intellectual property to drive northern growth

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll